From b18fecbd0ea33c9db7e3fd676ed7b5877ebb1bd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: José Fonseca Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:36:14 +0100 Subject: llvmpipe: Remove outdated comment about stencil testing. --- src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_bld_depth.c | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe') diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_bld_depth.c b/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_bld_depth.c index e768493103..264fce8d6a 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_bld_depth.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_bld_depth.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /************************************************************************** * - * Copyright 2009 VMware, Inc. + * Copyright 2009-2010 VMware, Inc. * All Rights Reserved. * * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a @@ -53,15 +53,8 @@ * ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... * * - * Stencil test: - * Two-sided stencil test is supported but probably not as efficient as - * it could be. Currently, we use if/then/else constructs to do the - * operations for front vs. back-facing polygons. We could probably do - * both the front and back arithmetic then use a Select() instruction to - * choose the result depending on polyon orientation. We'd have to - * measure performance both ways and see which is better. - * * @author Jose Fonseca + * @author Brian Paul */ #include "pipe/p_state.h" -- cgit v1.2.3