From e9b17d6477f99838fc7f261ea1b8d47eea12f42f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Paul Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:31:31 -0600 Subject: i965: be clear that the Fallback field is a boolean, not a bitfield --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fallback.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fallback.c') diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fallback.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fallback.c index d27c6c24ca..562a17844b 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fallback.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fallback.c @@ -133,7 +133,11 @@ const struct brw_tracked_state brw_check_fallback = { -/* Not used: +/** + * Called by the INTEL_FALLBACK() macro. + * NOTE: this is a no-op for the i965 driver. The brw->intel.Fallback + * field is treated as a boolean, not a bitmask. It's only set in a + * couple of places. */ void intelFallback( struct intel_context *intel, GLuint bit, GLboolean mode ) { -- cgit v1.2.3