From 5f86ae057a645c03dc1e0c51c2fb1b2628a50e0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Anholt Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:40:40 -0800 Subject: [intel] Rename lost_hardware vtbl entry to new_batch. Both drivers have ended up relying on lost_hardware being called after each batch buffer, so update the name. This removes one of the calls on 965 whic h was outside of the batchbuffer handling code and just duplicating what had already happened through batchbuffer handling. --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel') diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c index 7ad9a1a0a4..a6f19916d8 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c @@ -172,7 +172,6 @@ do_flush_locked(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch, sched_yield(); LOCK_HARDWARE(intel); } - intel->vtbl.lost_hardware(intel); } if (INTEL_DEBUG & DEBUG_BATCH) { @@ -184,6 +183,8 @@ do_flush_locked(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch, if (intel->vtbl.debug_batch != NULL) intel->vtbl.debug_batch(intel); } + + intel->vtbl.new_batch(intel); } void -- cgit v1.2.3