From f6ca4a304bf920ea6913b08638fb8eb3e020d446 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Anholt Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:54:14 -0800 Subject: intel: Don't complain when getparam fails due to a missing param. This is an expected behavior when we're testing for the presence of new kernel features. --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/mesa') diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c index 5c95c72732..64a21a147f 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ * **************************************************************************/ +#include #include "main/glheader.h" #include "main/context.h" #include "main/framebuffer.h" @@ -302,7 +303,8 @@ intel_get_param(__DRIscreen *psp, int param, int *value) ret = drmCommandWriteRead(psp->fd, DRM_I915_GETPARAM, &gp, sizeof(gp)); if (ret) { - _mesa_warning(NULL, "drm_i915_getparam: %d", ret); + if (ret != -EINVAL) + _mesa_warning(NULL, "drm_i915_getparam: %d", ret); return GL_FALSE; } -- cgit v1.2.3