Index

1. High-level Questions and Answers

1.1 What is Mesa?

Mesa is an open-source implementation of the OpenGL specification. OpenGL is a programming library for writing interactive 3D applications. See the OpenGL website for more information.

Mesa 6.x supports the OpenGL 1.5 specification.

1.2 Does Mesa support/use graphics hardware?

Yes. Specifically, Mesa serves as the OpenGL core for the open-source DRI drivers for XFree86/X.org. See the DRI website for more information.

There have been other hardware drivers for Mesa over the years (such as the 3Dfx Glide/Voodoo driver, an old S3 driver, etc) but the DRI drivers are the modern ones.

1.3 What purpose does Mesa serve today?

Hardware-accelerated OpenGL implementations are available for most popular operating systems today. Still, Mesa serves at least these purposes:

• Mesa is used as the core of the open-source XFree86/X.org DRI hardware drivers.
• Mesa is quite portable and allows OpenGL to be used on systems that have no other OpenGL solution.
• Software rendering with Mesa serves as a reference for validating the hardware drivers.
• A software implementation of OpenGL is useful for experimentation, such as testing new rendering techniques.
• Mesa can render images with deep color channels: 16-bit integer and 32-bit floating point color channels are supported. This capability is only now appearing in hardware.
• Mesa's internal limits (max lights, clip planes, texture size, etc) can be changed for special needs (hardware limits are hard to overcome).

1.4 What's the difference between"Stand-Alone" Mesa and the DRI drivers?

Stand-alone Mesa is the original incarnation of Mesa. On systems running the X Window System it does all its rendering through the Xlib API:

• The GLX API is supported, but it's really just an emulation of the real thing.
• The GLX wire protocol is not supported and there's no OpenGL extension loaded by the X server.
• There is no hardware acceleration.
• The OpenGL library, libGL.so, contains everything (the programming API, the GLX functions and all the rendering code).

Alternately, Mesa acts as the core for a number of OpenGL hardware drivers within the DRI (Direct Rendering Infrastructure):

• The libGL.so library provides the GL and GLX API functions, a GLX protocol encoder, and a device driver loader.
• The device driver modules (such as r200_dri.so) contain a built-in copy of the core Mesa code.
• The X server loads the GLX module. The GLX module decodes incoming GLX protocol and dispatches the commands to a rendering module. For the DRI, this module is basically a software Mesa renderer.

1.5 How do I upgrade my DRI installation to use a new Mesa release?

This wasn't easy in the past. Now, the DRI drivers are included in the Mesa tree and can be compiled separately from the X server. Just follow the Mesa compilation instructions.

1.6 Are there other open-source implementations of OpenGL?

Yes, SGI's OpenGL Sample Implemenation (SI) is available. The SI was written during the time that OpenGL was originally designed. Unfortunately, development of the SI has stagnated. Mesa is much more up to date with modern features and extensions.

Vincent is an open-source implementation of OpenGL ES for mobile devices.

miniGL is a subset of OpenGL for PalmOS devices.

TinyGL is a subset of OpenGL.

SoftGL is an OpenGL subset for mobile devices.

Chromium isn't a conventional OpenGL implementation (it's layered upon OpenGL), but it does export the OpenGL API. It allows tiled rendering, sort-last rendering, etc.

ClosedGL is an OpenGL subset library for TI graphing calculators.

There may be other open OpenGL implementations, but Mesa is the most popular and feature-complete.

2. Compilation and Installation Problems

2.1 What's the easiest way to install Mesa?

If you're using a Linux-based system, your distro CD most likely already has Mesa packages (like RPM or DEB) which you can easily install.

2.2 Running configure; make doesn't Work

Mesa no longer supports GNU autoconf/automake. Why?

• It seemed to seldom work on anything but Linux
• The config files were hard to maintain and hard to understand
• libtool caused a lot of grief

Now Mesa again uses a conventional Makefile system (as it did originally). Basically, each Makefile in the tree includes one of the configuration files from the config/ directory. The config files specify all the variables for a variety of popular systems.

2.3 I get undefined symbols such as bgnpolygon, v3f, etc...

You're application is written in IRIS GL, not OpenGL. IRIS GL was the predecessor to OpenGL and is a different thing (almost) entirely. Mesa's not the solution.

2.4 Where is the GLUT library?

GLUT (OpenGL Utility Toolkit) is in the separate MesaGLUT-x.y.z.tar.gz file. If you don't already have GLUT installed, you should grab the MesaGLUT package and compile it with the rest of Mesa.

2.5 What's the proper place for the libraries and headers?

On Linux-based systems you'll want to follow the Linux ABI standard. Basically you'll want the following:

• /usr/include/GL/gl.h - the main OpenGL header
• /usr/include/GL/glu.h - the OpenGL GLU (utility) header
• /usr/include/GL/glx.h - the OpenGL GLX header
• /usr/include/GL/glext.h - the OpenGL extensions header
• /usr/include/GL/glxext.h - the OpenGL GLX extensions header
• /usr/include/GL/osmesa.h - the Mesa off-screen rendering header
• /usr/lib/libGL.so - a symlink to libGL.so.1
• /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 - a symlink to libGL.so.1.xyz
• /usr/lib/libGL.so.xyz - the actual OpenGL/Mesa library. xyz denotes the Mesa version number.
• /usr/lib/libGLU.so - a symlink to libGLU.so.1
• /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 - a symlink to libGLU.so.1.3.xyz
• /usr/lib/libGLU.so.xyz - the OpenGL Utility library. xyz denotes the Mesa version number.

After installing XFree86/X.org and the DRI drivers, some of these files may be symlinks into the /usr/X11R6/ tree.

The old-style Makefile system doesn't install the Mesa libraries; it's up to you to copy them (and the headers) to the right place.

The GLUT header and library should go in the same directories.

3. Runtime / Rendering Problems

3.1 Rendering is slow / why isn't my graphics hardware being used?

Stand-alone Mesa (downloaded as MesaLib-x.y.z.tar.gz) doesn't have any support for hardware acceleration (with the exception of the 3DFX Voodoo driver).

What you really want is a DRI or NVIDIA (or another vendor's OpenGL) driver for your particular hardware.

You can run the glxinfo program to learn about your OpenGL library. Look for the GL_VENDOR and GL_RENDERER values. That will identify who's OpenGL library you're using and what sort of hardware it has detected.

If your DRI-based driver isn't working, go to the DRI website for trouble-shooting information.

3.2 I'm seeing errors in depth (Z) buffering. Why?

Make sure the ratio of the far to near clipping planes isn't too great. Look here for details.

Mesa uses a 16-bit depth buffer by default which is smaller and faster to clear than a 32-bit buffer but not as accurate. If you need a deeper you can modify the parameters to glXChooseVisual in your code.

3.3 Why Isn't depth buffering working at all?

Be sure you're requesting a depth buffered-visual. If you set the MESA_DEBUG environment variable it will warn you about trying to enable depth testing when you don't have a depth buffer.

Specifically, make sure glutInitDisplayMode is being called with GLUT_DEPTH or glXChooseVisual is being called with a non-zero value for GLX_DEPTH_SIZE.

This discussion applies to stencil buffers, accumulation buffers and alpha channels too.

3.4 Why does glGetString() always return NULL?

Be sure you have an active/current OpenGL rendering context before calling glGetString.

3.5 GL_POINTS and GL_LINES don't touch the right pixels

If you're trying to draw a filled region by using GL_POINTS or GL_LINES and seeing holes or gaps it's because of a float-to-int rounding problem. But this is not a bug. See Appendix H of the OpenGL Programming Guide - "OpenGL Correctness Tips". Basically, applying a translation of (0.375, 0.375, 0.0) to your coordinates will fix the problem.

4. Developer Questions

4.1 How can I contribute?

First, join the Mesa3d-dev mailing list. That's where Mesa development is discussed.

The OpenGL Specification is the bible for OpenGL implemention work. You should read it.

Most of the Mesa development work involves implementing new OpenGL extensions, writing hardware drivers (for the DRI), and code optimization.

4.2 How do I write a new device driver?

Unfortunately, writing a device driver isn't easy. It requires detailed understanding of OpenGL, the Mesa code, and your target hardware/operating system. 3D graphics are not simple.

The best way to get started is to use an existing driver as your starting point. For a software driver, the X11 and OSMesa drivers are good examples. For a hardware driver, the Radeon and R200 DRI drivers are good examples.

The DRI website has more information about writing hardware drivers. The process isn't well document because the Mesa driver interface changes over time, and we seldome have spare time for writing documentation. That being said, many people have managed to figure out the process.

Joining the appropriate mailing lists and asking questions (and searching the archives) is a good way to get information.

4.3 Why isn't GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc implemented in Mesa?

The specification for the extension indicates that there are intellectual property (IP) and/or patent issues to be dealt with.

We've been unsucessful in getting a response from S3 (or whoever owns the IP nowadays) to indicate whether or not an open source project can implement the extension (specifically the compression/decompression algorithms).

In the mean time, a 3rd party plug-in library is available.