summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/toolchain/gdb/6.3/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'toolchain/gdb/6.3/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch')
-rw-r--r--toolchain/gdb/6.3/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch464
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 464 deletions
diff --git a/toolchain/gdb/6.3/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch b/toolchain/gdb/6.3/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 666d34342..000000000
--- a/toolchain/gdb/6.3/700-debian_cp-pass-by-reference.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,464 +0,0 @@
-This patch needs to be submitted for the FSF. Also, there may be testcases
-already in the GDB testsuite (currently disabled) that it would probably fix.
-
-Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/infcall.c
-===================================================================
---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/infcall.c 2004-10-08 04:15:56.000000000 -0400
-+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/infcall.c 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500
-@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
- #include "gdb_string.h"
- #include "infcall.h"
- #include "dummy-frame.h"
-+#include "cp-abi.h"
-
- /* NOTE: cagney/2003-04-16: What's the future of this code?
-
-@@ -297,8 +298,8 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun
- {
- CORE_ADDR sp;
- CORE_ADDR dummy_addr;
-- struct type *value_type;
-- unsigned char struct_return;
-+ struct type *value_type, *target_value_type;
-+ unsigned char struct_return = 0, cp_struct_return = 0;
- CORE_ADDR struct_addr = 0;
- struct regcache *retbuf;
- struct cleanup *retbuf_cleanup;
-@@ -312,6 +313,7 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun
- struct regcache *caller_regcache;
- struct cleanup *caller_regcache_cleanup;
- struct frame_id dummy_id;
-+ struct cleanup *args_cleanup;
-
- if (!target_has_execution)
- noprocess ();
-@@ -410,10 +412,31 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun
- using_gcc = (b == NULL ? 2 : BLOCK_GCC_COMPILED (b));
- }
-
-- /* Are we returning a value using a structure return or a normal
-- value return? */
-+ /* Are we returning a value using a structure return (passing a
-+ hidden argument pointing to storage) or a normal value return?
-+ There are two cases: C++ ABI mandated structure return and
-+ target ABI structure return. The variable STRUCT_RETURN only
-+ describes the latter. The C++ version is handled by passing
-+ the return location as the first parameter to the function,
-+ even preceding "this". This is different from the target
-+ ABI version, which is target-specific; for instance, on ia64
-+ the first argument is passed in out0 but the hidden structure
-+ return pointer would normally be passed in r8. */
-
-- struct_return = using_struct_return (value_type, using_gcc);
-+ if (current_language->la_language == language_cplus
-+ && cp_pass_by_reference (value_type))
-+ {
-+ cp_struct_return = 1;
-+
-+ /* Tell the target specific argument pushing routine not to
-+ expect a value. */
-+ target_value_type = builtin_type_void;
-+ }
-+ else
-+ {
-+ struct_return = using_struct_return (value_type, using_gcc);
-+ target_value_type = value_type;
-+ }
-
- /* Determine the location of the breakpoint (and possibly other
- stuff) that the called function will return to. The SPARC, for a
-@@ -432,7 +455,7 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun
- if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
- {
- sp = push_dummy_code (current_gdbarch, sp, funaddr,
-- using_gcc, args, nargs, value_type,
-+ using_gcc, args, nargs, target_value_type,
- &real_pc, &bp_addr);
- dummy_addr = sp;
- }
-@@ -440,7 +463,7 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun
- {
- dummy_addr = sp;
- sp = push_dummy_code (current_gdbarch, sp, funaddr,
-- using_gcc, args, nargs, value_type,
-+ using_gcc, args, nargs, target_value_type,
- &real_pc, &bp_addr);
- }
- break;
-@@ -507,9 +530,15 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *fun
- param_type = TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (ftype, i);
- else
- param_type = NULL;
--
-+
- args[i] = value_arg_coerce (args[i], param_type, prototyped);
-
-+ /* FIXME: Is current_language the right language? */
-+ if (current_language->la_language == language_cplus
-+ && param_type != NULL
-+ && cp_pass_by_reference (param_type))
-+ args[i] = value_addr (args[i]);
-+
- /* elz: this code is to handle the case in which the function
- to be called has a pointer to function as parameter and the
- corresponding actual argument is the address of a function
-@@ -607,7 +636,7 @@ You must use a pointer to function type
- stack, if necessary. Make certain that the value is correctly
- aligned. */
-
-- if (struct_return)
-+ if (struct_return || cp_struct_return)
- {
- int len = TYPE_LENGTH (value_type);
- if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
-@@ -632,6 +661,22 @@ You must use a pointer to function type
- }
- }
-
-+ if (cp_struct_return)
-+ {
-+ struct value **new_args;
-+
-+ /* Add the new argument to the front of the argument list. */
-+ new_args = xmalloc (sizeof (struct value *) * (nargs + 1));
-+ new_args[0] = value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type),
-+ struct_addr);
-+ memcpy (&new_args[1], &args[0], sizeof (struct value *) * nargs);
-+ args = new_args;
-+ nargs++;
-+ args_cleanup = make_cleanup (xfree, args);
-+ }
-+ else
-+ args_cleanup = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
-+
- /* Create the dummy stack frame. Pass in the call dummy address as,
- presumably, the ABI code knows where, in the call dummy, the
- return address should be pointed. */
-@@ -649,6 +694,8 @@ You must use a pointer to function type
- else
- error ("This target does not support function calls");
-
-+ do_cleanups (args_cleanup);
-+
- /* Set up a frame ID for the dummy frame so we can pass it to
- set_momentary_breakpoint. We need to give the breakpoint a frame
- ID so that the breakpoint code can correctly re-identify the
-@@ -839,11 +886,7 @@ the function call).", name);
- /* Figure out the value returned by the function, return that. */
- {
- struct value *retval;
-- if (TYPE_CODE (value_type) == TYPE_CODE_VOID)
-- /* If the function returns void, don't bother fetching the
-- return value. */
-- retval = allocate_value (value_type);
-- else if (struct_return)
-+ if (struct_return || cp_struct_return)
- /* NOTE: cagney/2003-09-27: This assumes that PUSH_DUMMY_CALL
- has correctly stored STRUCT_ADDR in the target. In the past
- that hasn't been the case, the old MIPS PUSH_ARGUMENTS
-@@ -853,6 +896,10 @@ the function call).", name);
- "struct return convention", check that PUSH_DUMMY_CALL isn't
- playing tricks. */
- retval = value_at (value_type, struct_addr, NULL);
-+ else if (TYPE_CODE (value_type) == TYPE_CODE_VOID)
-+ /* If the function returns void, don't bother fetching the
-+ return value. */
-+ retval = allocate_value (value_type);
- else
- {
- /* This code only handles "register convention". */
-Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/cp-abi.h
-===================================================================
---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/cp-abi.h 2003-04-12 13:41:25.000000000 -0400
-+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/cp-abi.h 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500
-@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
- /* Abstraction of various C++ ABI's we support, and the info we need
- to get from them.
- Contributed by Daniel Berlin <dberlin@redhat.com>
-- Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-+ Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-
- This file is part of GDB.
-
-@@ -145,6 +145,10 @@ extern struct type *value_rtti_type (str
- extern int baseclass_offset (struct type *type, int index, char *valaddr,
- CORE_ADDR address);
-
-+/* Return non-zero if an argument of type TYPE should be passed by reference
-+ instead of value. */
-+extern int cp_pass_by_reference (struct type *type);
-+
- struct cp_abi_ops
- {
- const char *shortname;
-@@ -162,6 +166,7 @@ struct cp_abi_ops
- int *using_enc);
- int (*baseclass_offset) (struct type *type, int index, char *valaddr,
- CORE_ADDR address);
-+ int (*pass_by_reference) (struct type *type);
- };
-
-
-Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/cp-abi.c
-===================================================================
---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/cp-abi.c 2003-11-26 17:04:00.000000000 -0500
-+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/cp-abi.c 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500
-@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
- /* Generic code for supporting multiple C++ ABI's
-- Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-+ Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-
- This file is part of GDB.
-
-@@ -94,6 +94,14 @@ value_rtti_type (struct value *v, int *f
- return (*current_cp_abi.rtti_type) (v, full, top, using_enc);
- }
-
-+int
-+cp_pass_by_reference (struct type *type)
-+{
-+ if ((current_cp_abi.pass_by_reference) == NULL)
-+ return 0;
-+ return (*current_cp_abi.pass_by_reference) (type);
-+}
-+
- /* Set the current C++ ABI to SHORT_NAME. */
-
- static int
-Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c
-===================================================================
---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c 2004-03-15 15:38:08.000000000 -0500
-+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500
-@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
- /* Abstraction of GNU v3 abi.
- Contributed by Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
-
-- Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-+ Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-
- This file is part of GDB.
-
-@@ -419,6 +419,84 @@ gnuv3_baseclass_offset (struct type *typ
- return base_offset;
- }
-
-+/* Return nonzero if a type should be passed by reference.
-+
-+ The rule in the v3 ABI document comes from section 3.1.1. If the
-+ type has a non-trivial copy constructor or destructor, then the
-+ caller must make a copy (by calling the copy constructor if there
-+ is one or perform the copy itself otherwise), pass the address of
-+ the copy, and then destroy the temporary (if necessary).
-+
-+ For return values with non-trivial copy constructors or
-+ destructors, space will be allocated in the caller, and a pointer
-+ will be passed as the first argument (preceding "this").
-+
-+ We don't have a bulletproof mechanism for determining whether a
-+ constructor or destructor is trivial. For GCC and DWARF2 debug
-+ information, we can check the artificial flag.
-+
-+ We don't do anything with the constructors or destructors yet,
-+ but we have to get the argument passing right anyway. */
-+static int
-+gnuv3_pass_by_reference (struct type *type)
-+{
-+ int fieldnum, fieldelem, basenum;
-+
-+ CHECK_TYPEDEF (type);
-+
-+ /* We're only interested in things that can have methods. */
-+ if (TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_STRUCT
-+ && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_CLASS
-+ && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_UNION)
-+ return 0;
-+
-+ for (fieldnum = 0; fieldnum < TYPE_NFN_FIELDS (type); fieldnum++)
-+ for (fieldelem = 0; fieldelem < TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST_LENGTH (type, fieldnum);
-+ fieldelem++)
-+ {
-+ struct fn_field *fn = TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST1 (type, fieldnum);
-+ char *name = TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST_NAME (type, fieldnum);
-+ struct type *fieldtype = TYPE_FN_FIELD_TYPE (fn, fieldelem);
-+
-+ /* If this function is marked as artificial, it is compiler-generated,
-+ and we assume it is trivial. */
-+ if (TYPE_FN_FIELD_ARTIFICIAL (fn, fieldelem))
-+ continue;
-+
-+ /* If we've found a destructor, we must pass this by reference. */
-+ if (name[0] == '~')
-+ return 1;
-+
-+ /* If the mangled name of this method doesn't indicate that it
-+ is a constructor, we're not interested.
-+
-+ FIXME drow/2004-05-27: We could do this using the name of
-+ the method and the name of the class instead of dealing
-+ with the mangled name. We don't have a convenient function
-+ to strip off both leading scope qualifiers and trailing
-+ template arguments yet. */
-+ if (!is_constructor_name (TYPE_FN_FIELD_PHYSNAME (fn, fieldelem)))
-+ continue;
-+
-+ /* If this method takes two arguments, and the second argument is
-+ a reference to this class, then it is a copy constructor. */
-+ if (TYPE_NFIELDS (fieldtype) == 2
-+ && TYPE_CODE (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (fieldtype, 1)) == TYPE_CODE_REF
-+ && check_typedef (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (fieldtype, 1))) == type)
-+ return 1;
-+ }
-+
-+ /* Even if all the constructors and destructors were artificial, one
-+ of them may have invoked a non-artificial constructor or
-+ destructor in a base class. If any base class needs to be passed
-+ by reference, so does this class. */
-+ for (basenum = 0; basenum < TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type); basenum++)
-+ if (gnuv3_pass_by_reference (TYPE_BASECLASS (type, basenum)))
-+ return 1;
-+
-+ return 0;
-+}
-+
- static void
- init_gnuv3_ops (void)
- {
-@@ -434,6 +512,7 @@ init_gnuv3_ops (void)
- gnu_v3_abi_ops.rtti_type = gnuv3_rtti_type;
- gnu_v3_abi_ops.virtual_fn_field = gnuv3_virtual_fn_field;
- gnu_v3_abi_ops.baseclass_offset = gnuv3_baseclass_offset;
-+ gnu_v3_abi_ops.pass_by_reference = gnuv3_pass_by_reference;
- }
-
- extern initialize_file_ftype _initialize_gnu_v3_abi; /* -Wmissing-prototypes */
-Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/hpacc-abi.c
-===================================================================
---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/hpacc-abi.c 2003-06-08 14:27:13.000000000 -0400
-+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/hpacc-abi.c 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500
-@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
- Most of the real code is from HP, i've just fiddled it to fit in
- the C++ ABI abstraction framework.
-
-- Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-+ Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-
- This file is part of GDB.
-
-Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/Makefile.in
-===================================================================
---- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/Makefile.in 2004-11-10 12:30:06.000000000 -0500
-+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/Makefile.in 2004-11-10 12:30:07.000000000 -0500
-@@ -2073,7 +2073,7 @@ ia64-tdep.o: ia64-tdep.c $(defs_h) $(inf
- infcall.o: infcall.c $(defs_h) $(breakpoint_h) $(target_h) $(regcache_h) \
- $(inferior_h) $(gdb_assert_h) $(block_h) $(gdbcore_h) $(language_h) \
- $(objfiles_h) $(gdbcmd_h) $(command_h) $(gdb_string_h) $(infcall_h) \
-- $(dummy_frame_h)
-+ $(dummy_frame_h) $(cp_abi_h)
- inf-child.o: inf-child.c $(defs_h) $(regcache_h) $(memattr_h) $(symtab_h) \
- $(target_h) $(inferior_h) $(gdb_string_h)
- infcmd.o: infcmd.c $(defs_h) $(gdb_string_h) $(symtab_h) $(gdbtypes_h) \
-Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/pass-by-ref.exp
-===================================================================
---- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
-+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/pass-by-ref.exp 2004-11-11 09:48:00.498518899 -0500
-@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
-+# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
-+
-+# Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-+
-+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
-+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
-+# (at your option) any later version.
-+#
-+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
-+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
-+# GNU General Public License for more details.
-+#
-+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-+# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-+# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
-+
-+# Check that GDB can call C++ functions whose parameters have
-+# object type, but are passed by reference.
-+
-+set testfile "pass-by-ref"
-+set srcfile ${testfile}.cc
-+set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
-+if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } {
-+ return -1
-+}
-+
-+gdb_exit
-+gdb_start
-+gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
-+gdb_load ${binfile}
-+
-+if ![runto_main] then {
-+ return -1
-+}
-+
-+gdb_test "print foo (global_obj)" " = 3" "call function"
-Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/pass-by-ref.cc
-===================================================================
---- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
-+++ gdb-6.3/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/pass-by-ref.cc 2004-11-11 09:44:17.815014667 -0500
-@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
-+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
-+
-+ Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-+
-+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
-+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
-+ (at your option) any later version.
-+
-+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
-+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
-+ GNU General Public License for more details.
-+
-+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-+ along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-+ Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307,
-+ USA. */
-+
-+class Obj {
-+public:
-+ Obj ();
-+ Obj (const Obj &);
-+ ~Obj ();
-+ int var[2];
-+};
-+
-+int foo (Obj arg)
-+{
-+ return arg.var[0] + arg.var[1];
-+}
-+
-+Obj::Obj ()
-+{
-+ var[0] = 1;
-+ var[1] = 2;
-+}
-+
-+Obj::Obj (const Obj &obj)
-+{
-+ var[0] = obj.var[0];
-+ var[1] = obj.var[1];
-+}
-+
-+Obj::~Obj ()
-+{
-+
-+}
-+
-+Obj global_obj;
-+
-+int
-+main ()
-+{
-+ int bar = foo (global_obj);
-+ return bar;
-+}